This is one of the site’s deepest example collections: 300 original examples organized across 6 practical categories. Search, filter, and compare patterns without reading the list in order.
Effective participial phrases sit close to the noun they modify, make the implied actor unmistakable, and add useful descriptive or causal information without creating dangling or misplaced modifiers.
Use these fuller examples to see what changes between a recognizable pattern and a finished piece of writing. The examples are original or explicitly illustrative, so they demonstrate structure without inventing real-world evidence.
Repair
An introductory participial phrase normally modifies the subject of the following clause.
Why it works: The mountains are not doing the driving. Make the understood actor the subject: “Driving through the valley, we saw enormous mountains.”
Compare
Form alone does not determine grammatical function.
Why it works: In the first sentence the -ing phrase functions as a noun subject; in the second it modifies “analyst,” so it is participial.
These transformations make the hidden planning step visible so the template does not become a fill-in-the-blanks substitute for judgment.
Starting material: Reviewing the file, the error became obvious.
Result: Reviewing the file, the editor immediately noticed the error.
Starting material: The inspector photographed the railing beside the stairs damaged by the storm.
Result: The inspector photographed the railing, damaged by the storm, beside the stairs.
| Level | What changes | Quality test |
|---|---|---|
| Recognition | Identify the participle plus its dependents, then locate the noun or pronoun the whole phrase modifies. | The phrase is distinguished from a gerund phrase and from a finite progressive/passive verb. |
| Placement | Use introductory, post-noun, and supplementary participial phrases only where their implied actor or modified noun is unmistakable. | The phrase sits close enough to its target to avoid competing attachments. |
| Modifier control | Repair dangling and misplaced participles, distinguish restrictive-looking modifiers from supplements, and vary participial openings so they do not become a mechanical prose habit. | Every participial phrase has an explicit, logically compatible target. |
Participial-phrase map Participle: [x] Objects/complements/modifiers: [x] Complete phrase: [x] Modified noun/pronoun: [x] Is that target explicit and nearby?: [yes/no] Gerund/finite-verb alternative?: [check]
Dangling-modifier repair Opening phrase: [x] Implied actor: [x] Current main-clause subject: [x] Do they match?: [yes/no] Rewrite subject or phrase: [x] Final sentence: [x]
Reviewing the final numbers, Maya noticed a duplicated invoice.
Damaged during transit, the package was returned to the supplier.
The cyclist wearing the yellow jacket signaled before turning.
Built in the 1920s, the theater still has its original balcony.
Dangling: Driving through the valley, the mountains looked enormous. Repair: Driving through the valley, we saw enormous mountains.
The report, revised after the audit, now includes the missing assumptions.
Hearing the alarm, the technician shut down the test rig.
Customers waiting near the entrance were given numbered tickets.
Checking the final citation, the editor found the earlier wording. — Participial phrase: “Checking the final citation”; the understood actor is the grammatical subject of the following main clause.
Damaged during transit, the parcel was returned to the supplier. — Past-participial phrase: “Damaged during transit”; it modifies the subject that immediately follows and describes its state or history.
The cyclist wearing the yellow jacket signaled before turning. — Participial phrase: “wearing the yellow jacket”; it modifies the noun immediately before it rather than forming the sentence’s finite verb.
The report, revised after the audit, includes the missing assumption. — Participial phrase: “revised after the audit”; the commas mark supplementary modification of an already identified noun.
Faulty attachment: Reviewing the archive copy during the morning check, the missing citation seemed obvious. Repair: Reviewing the archive copy during the morning check, the editor noticed the missing citation immediately. — The participial phrase must modify the editor, so that actor is made the subject of the main clause.
Checking the final citation, Mara noticed a missing trail marker. — Participial phrase: “Checking the final citation”; the understood actor is the grammatical subject of the following main clause.
Damaged during transit, the staircase received an additional inspection. — Past-participial phrase: “Damaged during transit”; it modifies the subject that immediately follows and describes its state or history.
The cyclist reviewing the raw dataset noticed the duplicated record. — Participial phrase: “reviewing the raw dataset”; it modifies the noun immediately before it rather than forming the sentence’s finite verb.
The report, damaged during transit, was returned to the sender. — Participial phrase: “damaged during transit”; the commas mark supplementary modification of an already identified noun.
Faulty attachment: Reviewing the archive copy before the handoff, the missing citation seemed obvious. Repair: Reviewing the archive copy before the handoff, the editor noticed the missing citation immediately. — The participial phrase must modify the editor, so that actor is made the subject of the main clause.
Checking the final citation, the reviewer caught an unsupported inference. — Participial phrase: “Checking the final citation”; the understood actor is the grammatical subject of the following main clause.
Damaged during transit, the report now states the missing limitation. — Past-participial phrase: “Damaged during transit”; it modifies the subject that immediately follows and describes its state or history.
The cyclist waiting beside the marked door received numbered tickets. — Participial phrase: “waiting beside the marked door”; it modifies the noun immediately before it rather than forming the sentence’s finite verb.
The report, built in the 1920s, still carries the original plaque. — Participial phrase: “built in the 1920s”; the commas mark supplementary modification of an already identified noun.
Faulty attachment: Reviewing the archive copy after the second review, the missing citation seemed obvious. Repair: Reviewing the archive copy after the second review, the editor noticed the missing citation immediately. — The participial phrase must modify the editor, so that actor is made the subject of the main clause.
Checking the final citation, the technician heard the second alarm. — Participial phrase: “Checking the final citation”; the understood actor is the grammatical subject of the following main clause.
Damaged during transit, the sample remained unopened until testing. — Past-participial phrase: “Damaged during transit”; it modifies the subject that immediately follows and describes its state or history.
The cyclist carrying the sealed envelope went directly to the front desk. — Participial phrase: “carrying the sealed envelope”; it modifies the noun immediately before it rather than forming the sentence’s finite verb.
The report, saved before the outage, opened without corruption. — Participial phrase: “saved before the outage”; the commas mark supplementary modification of an already identified noun.
Faulty attachment: Reviewing the archive copy at the final checkpoint, the missing citation seemed obvious. Repair: Reviewing the archive copy at the final checkpoint, the editor noticed the missing citation immediately. — The participial phrase must modify the editor, so that actor is made the subject of the main clause.
Checking the final citation, the courier signed the handoff log. — Participial phrase: “Checking the final citation”; the understood actor is the grammatical subject of the following main clause.
Damaged during transit, the archive box required cross-checking. — Past-participial phrase: “Damaged during transit”; it modifies the subject that immediately follows and describes its state or history.
The cyclist checking the pressure gauge paused the test. — Participial phrase: “checking the pressure gauge”; it modifies the noun immediately before it rather than forming the sentence’s finite verb.
The report, calibrated that morning, passed the second check. — Participial phrase: “calibrated that morning”; the commas mark supplementary modification of an already identified noun.
Faulty attachment: Reviewing the archive copy while the room was quiet, the missing citation seemed obvious. Repair: Reviewing the archive copy while the room was quiet, the editor noticed the missing citation immediately. — The participial phrase must modify the editor, so that actor is made the subject of the main clause.
Checking the final citation, the analyst found a rounding difference. — Participial phrase: “Checking the final citation”; the understood actor is the grammatical subject of the following main clause.
Damaged during transit, the shipment arrived after the cutoff. — Past-participial phrase: “Damaged during transit”; it modifies the subject that immediately follows and describes its state or history.
The cyclist leading the second group stopped at the junction. — Participial phrase: “leading the second group”; it modifies the noun immediately before it rather than forming the sentence’s finite verb.
The report, closed after the rockfall, reopens only after clearance. — Participial phrase: “closed after the rockfall”; the commas mark supplementary modification of an already identified noun.
Faulty attachment: Reviewing the archive copy before the next decision, the missing citation seemed obvious. Repair: Reviewing the archive copy before the next decision, the editor noticed the missing citation immediately. — The participial phrase must modify the editor, so that actor is made the subject of the main clause.
Checking the final citation, the guide moved the group uphill. — Participial phrase: “Checking the final citation”; the understood actor is the grammatical subject of the following main clause.
Damaged during transit, the manuscript stayed in stable condition. — Past-participial phrase: “Damaged during transit”; it modifies the subject that immediately follows and describes its state or history.
The cyclist sorting the returned volumes found the missing index card. — Participial phrase: “sorting the returned volumes”; it modifies the noun immediately before it rather than forming the sentence’s finite verb.
The report, annotated by the editor, shows three distinct hands. — Participial phrase: “annotated by the editor”; the commas mark supplementary modification of an already identified noun.
Faulty attachment: Comparing the two datasets during the morning check, the rounding difference became clear. Repair: Comparing the two datasets during the morning check, the analyst found the rounding difference. — The participial phrase must modify the analyst, so that actor is made the subject of the main clause.
Checking the final citation, the manager identified a conflicting clause. — Participial phrase: “Checking the final citation”; the understood actor is the grammatical subject of the following main clause.
Damaged during transit, the policy entered the publication queue. — Past-participial phrase: “Damaged during transit”; it modifies the subject that immediately follows and describes its state or history.
The cyclist photographing the damaged railing added a scale marker. — Participial phrase: “photographing the damaged railing”; it modifies the noun immediately before it rather than forming the sentence’s finite verb.
The report, locked during the inspection, contains the backup key. — Participial phrase: “locked during the inspection”; the commas mark supplementary modification of an already identified noun.
Faulty attachment: Comparing the two datasets before the handoff, the rounding difference became clear. Repair: Comparing the two datasets before the handoff, the analyst found the rounding difference. — The participial phrase must modify the analyst, so that actor is made the subject of the main clause.
Checking the final citation, the engineer recorded the failover time. — Participial phrase: “Checking the final citation”; the understood actor is the grammatical subject of the following main clause.
Damaged during transit, the wall provided a useful comparison image. — Past-participial phrase: “Damaged during transit”; it modifies the subject that immediately follows and describes its state or history.
The cyclist holding the blue folder was called into the room. — Participial phrase: “holding the blue folder”; it modifies the noun immediately before it rather than forming the sentence’s finite verb.
The report, taken before sunrise, records the earlier condition. — Participial phrase: “taken before sunrise”; the commas mark supplementary modification of an already identified noun.
Faulty attachment: Comparing the two datasets after the second review, the rounding difference became clear. Repair: Comparing the two datasets after the second review, the analyst found the rounding difference. — The participial phrase must modify the analyst, so that actor is made the subject of the main clause.
Checking the final citation, the inspector documented a second crack. — Participial phrase: “Checking the final citation”; the understood actor is the grammatical subject of the following main clause.
Damaged during transit, the annotation remained readable. — Past-participial phrase: “Damaged during transit”; it modifies the subject that immediately follows and describes its state or history.
The cyclist standing near the side entrance captured the final frame. — Participial phrase: “standing near the side entrance”; it modifies the noun immediately before it rather than forming the sentence’s finite verb.
The report, approved on Tuesday, takes effect next Monday. — Participial phrase: “approved on Tuesday”; the commas mark supplementary modification of an already identified noun.
Faulty attachment: Comparing the two datasets at the final checkpoint, the rounding difference became clear. Repair: Comparing the two datasets at the final checkpoint, the analyst found the rounding difference. — The participial phrase must modify the analyst, so that actor is made the subject of the main clause.
Walking along the marked ridge, the editor found the earlier wording. — Participial phrase: “Walking along the marked ridge”; the understood actor is the grammatical subject of the following main clause.
Damaged during transit, the backup server continued logging locally. — Past-participial phrase: “Damaged during transit”; it modifies the subject that immediately follows and describes its state or history.
The cyclist following the detour signs avoided the closed bridge. — Participial phrase: “following the detour signs”; it modifies the noun immediately before it rather than forming the sentence’s finite verb.
The report, collected at the riverbank, remained sealed until analysis. — Participial phrase: “collected at the riverbank”; the commas mark supplementary modification of an already identified noun.
Faulty attachment: Comparing the two datasets while the room was quiet, the rounding difference became clear. Repair: Comparing the two datasets while the room was quiet, the analyst found the rounding difference. — The participial phrase must modify the analyst, so that actor is made the subject of the main clause.
Walking along the marked ridge, Mara noticed a missing trail marker. — Participial phrase: “Walking along the marked ridge”; the understood actor is the grammatical subject of the following main clause.
Damaged during transit, the equipment stayed dry overnight. — Past-participial phrase: “Damaged during transit”; it modifies the subject that immediately follows and describes its state or history.
The cyclist recording the interview locally saved a backup copy. — Participial phrase: “recording the interview locally”; it modifies the noun immediately before it rather than forming the sentence’s finite verb.
The report, stored under cover, was moved after the warning. — Participial phrase: “stored under cover”; the commas mark supplementary modification of an already identified noun.
Faulty attachment: Comparing the two datasets before the next decision, the rounding difference became clear. Repair: Comparing the two datasets before the next decision, the analyst found the rounding difference. — The participial phrase must modify the analyst, so that actor is made the subject of the main clause.
Walking along the marked ridge, the reviewer caught an unsupported inference. — Participial phrase: “Walking along the marked ridge”; the understood actor is the grammatical subject of the following main clause.
Built before the current code, the parcel was returned to the supplier. — Past-participial phrase: “Built before the current code”; it modifies the subject that immediately follows and describes its state or history.
The analyst wearing the yellow jacket noticed the duplicated record. — Participial phrase: “wearing the yellow jacket”; it modifies the noun immediately before it rather than forming the sentence’s finite verb.
The package, revised after the audit, was returned to the sender. — Participial phrase: “revised after the audit”; the commas mark supplementary modification of an already identified noun.
Faulty attachment: Watching the pressure gauge during the morning check, the second spike looked alarming. Repair: Watching the pressure gauge during the morning check, the technician noticed the second spike. — The participial phrase must modify the technician, so that actor is made the subject of the main clause.
Walking along the marked ridge, the technician heard the second alarm. — Participial phrase: “Walking along the marked ridge”; the understood actor is the grammatical subject of the following main clause.
Built before the current code, the staircase received an additional inspection. — Past-participial phrase: “Built before the current code”; it modifies the subject that immediately follows and describes its state or history.
The analyst reviewing the raw dataset received numbered tickets. — Participial phrase: “reviewing the raw dataset”; it modifies the noun immediately before it rather than forming the sentence’s finite verb.
The package, damaged during transit, still carries the original plaque. — Participial phrase: “damaged during transit”; the commas mark supplementary modification of an already identified noun.
Faulty attachment: Watching the pressure gauge before the handoff, the second spike looked alarming. Repair: Watching the pressure gauge before the handoff, the technician noticed the second spike. — The participial phrase must modify the technician, so that actor is made the subject of the main clause.
Walking along the marked ridge, the courier signed the handoff log. — Participial phrase: “Walking along the marked ridge”; the understood actor is the grammatical subject of the following main clause.
Built before the current code, the report now states the missing limitation. — Past-participial phrase: “Built before the current code”; it modifies the subject that immediately follows and describes its state or history.
The analyst waiting beside the marked door went directly to the front desk. — Participial phrase: “waiting beside the marked door”; it modifies the noun immediately before it rather than forming the sentence’s finite verb.
The package, built in the 1920s, opened without corruption. — Participial phrase: “built in the 1920s”; the commas mark supplementary modification of an already identified noun.
Faulty attachment: Watching the pressure gauge after the second review, the second spike looked alarming. Repair: Watching the pressure gauge after the second review, the technician noticed the second spike. — The participial phrase must modify the technician, so that actor is made the subject of the main clause.
Walking along the marked ridge, the analyst found a rounding difference. — Participial phrase: “Walking along the marked ridge”; the understood actor is the grammatical subject of the following main clause.
Built before the current code, the sample remained unopened until testing. — Past-participial phrase: “Built before the current code”; it modifies the subject that immediately follows and describes its state or history.
The analyst carrying the sealed envelope paused the test. — Participial phrase: “carrying the sealed envelope”; it modifies the noun immediately before it rather than forming the sentence’s finite verb.
The package, saved before the outage, passed the second check. — Participial phrase: “saved before the outage”; the commas mark supplementary modification of an already identified noun.
Faulty attachment: Watching the pressure gauge at the final checkpoint, the second spike looked alarming. Repair: Watching the pressure gauge at the final checkpoint, the technician noticed the second spike. — The participial phrase must modify the technician, so that actor is made the subject of the main clause.
Walking along the marked ridge, the guide moved the group uphill. — Participial phrase: “Walking along the marked ridge”; the understood actor is the grammatical subject of the following main clause.
Built before the current code, the archive box required cross-checking. — Past-participial phrase: “Built before the current code”; it modifies the subject that immediately follows and describes its state or history.
The analyst checking the pressure gauge stopped at the junction. — Participial phrase: “checking the pressure gauge”; it modifies the noun immediately before it rather than forming the sentence’s finite verb.
The package, calibrated that morning, reopens only after clearance. — Participial phrase: “calibrated that morning”; the commas mark supplementary modification of an already identified noun.
Faulty attachment: Watching the pressure gauge while the room was quiet, the second spike looked alarming. Repair: Watching the pressure gauge while the room was quiet, the technician noticed the second spike. — The participial phrase must modify the technician, so that actor is made the subject of the main clause.
Walking along the marked ridge, the manager identified a conflicting clause. — Participial phrase: “Walking along the marked ridge”; the understood actor is the grammatical subject of the following main clause.
Built before the current code, the shipment arrived after the cutoff. — Past-participial phrase: “Built before the current code”; it modifies the subject that immediately follows and describes its state or history.
The analyst leading the second group found the missing index card. — Participial phrase: “leading the second group”; it modifies the noun immediately before it rather than forming the sentence’s finite verb.
The package, closed after the rockfall, shows three distinct hands. — Participial phrase: “closed after the rockfall”; the commas mark supplementary modification of an already identified noun.
Faulty attachment: Watching the pressure gauge before the next decision, the second spike looked alarming. Repair: Watching the pressure gauge before the next decision, the technician noticed the second spike. — The participial phrase must modify the technician, so that actor is made the subject of the main clause.
Walking along the marked ridge, the engineer recorded the failover time. — Participial phrase: “Walking along the marked ridge”; the understood actor is the grammatical subject of the following main clause.
Built before the current code, the manuscript stayed in stable condition. — Past-participial phrase: “Built before the current code”; it modifies the subject that immediately follows and describes its state or history.
The analyst sorting the returned volumes added a scale marker. — Participial phrase: “sorting the returned volumes”; it modifies the noun immediately before it rather than forming the sentence’s finite verb.
The package, annotated by the editor, contains the backup key. — Participial phrase: “annotated by the editor”; the commas mark supplementary modification of an already identified noun.
Faulty attachment: Checking the route map during the morning check, the bridge closure became obvious. Repair: Checking the route map during the morning check, the guide noticed the bridge closure. — The participial phrase must modify the guide, so that actor is made the subject of the main clause.
Walking along the marked ridge, the inspector documented a second crack. — Participial phrase: “Walking along the marked ridge”; the understood actor is the grammatical subject of the following main clause.
Built before the current code, the policy entered the publication queue. — Past-participial phrase: “Built before the current code”; it modifies the subject that immediately follows and describes its state or history.
The analyst photographing the damaged railing was called into the room. — Participial phrase: “photographing the damaged railing”; it modifies the noun immediately before it rather than forming the sentence’s finite verb.
The package, locked during the inspection, records the earlier condition. — Participial phrase: “locked during the inspection”; the commas mark supplementary modification of an already identified noun.
Faulty attachment: Checking the route map before the handoff, the bridge closure became obvious. Repair: Checking the route map before the handoff, the guide noticed the bridge closure. — The participial phrase must modify the guide, so that actor is made the subject of the main clause.
Reviewing the source note, the editor found the earlier wording. — Participial phrase: “Reviewing the source note”; the understood actor is the grammatical subject of the following main clause.
Built before the current code, the wall provided a useful comparison image. — Past-participial phrase: “Built before the current code”; it modifies the subject that immediately follows and describes its state or history.
The analyst holding the blue folder captured the final frame. — Participial phrase: “holding the blue folder”; it modifies the noun immediately before it rather than forming the sentence’s finite verb.
The package, taken before sunrise, takes effect next Monday. — Participial phrase: “taken before sunrise”; the commas mark supplementary modification of an already identified noun.
Faulty attachment: Checking the route map after the second review, the bridge closure became obvious. Repair: Checking the route map after the second review, the guide noticed the bridge closure. — The participial phrase must modify the guide, so that actor is made the subject of the main clause.
Reviewing the source note, Mara noticed a missing trail marker. — Participial phrase: “Reviewing the source note”; the understood actor is the grammatical subject of the following main clause.
Built before the current code, the annotation remained readable. — Past-participial phrase: “Built before the current code”; it modifies the subject that immediately follows and describes its state or history.
The analyst standing near the side entrance avoided the closed bridge. — Participial phrase: “standing near the side entrance”; it modifies the noun immediately before it rather than forming the sentence’s finite verb.
The package, approved on Tuesday, remained sealed until analysis. — Participial phrase: “approved on Tuesday”; the commas mark supplementary modification of an already identified noun.
Faulty attachment: Checking the route map at the final checkpoint, the bridge closure became obvious. Repair: Checking the route map at the final checkpoint, the guide noticed the bridge closure. — The participial phrase must modify the guide, so that actor is made the subject of the main clause.
Reviewing the source note, the reviewer caught an unsupported inference. — Participial phrase: “Reviewing the source note”; the understood actor is the grammatical subject of the following main clause.
Built before the current code, the backup server continued logging locally. — Past-participial phrase: “Built before the current code”; it modifies the subject that immediately follows and describes its state or history.
The analyst following the detour signs saved a backup copy. — Participial phrase: “following the detour signs”; it modifies the noun immediately before it rather than forming the sentence’s finite verb.
The package, collected at the riverbank, was moved after the warning. — Participial phrase: “collected at the riverbank”; the commas mark supplementary modification of an already identified noun.
Faulty attachment: Checking the route map while the room was quiet, the bridge closure became obvious. Repair: Checking the route map while the room was quiet, the guide noticed the bridge closure. — The participial phrase must modify the guide, so that actor is made the subject of the main clause.
Reviewing the source note, the technician heard the second alarm. — Participial phrase: “Reviewing the source note”; the understood actor is the grammatical subject of the following main clause.
Built before the current code, the equipment stayed dry overnight. — Past-participial phrase: “Built before the current code”; it modifies the subject that immediately follows and describes its state or history.
The analyst recording the interview locally signaled before turning. — Participial phrase: “recording the interview locally”; it modifies the noun immediately before it rather than forming the sentence’s finite verb.
The package, stored under cover, includes the missing assumption. — Participial phrase: “stored under cover”; the commas mark supplementary modification of an already identified noun.
Faulty attachment: Checking the route map before the next decision, the bridge closure became obvious. Repair: Checking the route map before the next decision, the guide noticed the bridge closure. — The participial phrase must modify the guide, so that actor is made the subject of the main clause.
Reviewing the source note, the courier signed the handoff log. — Participial phrase: “Reviewing the source note”; the understood actor is the grammatical subject of the following main clause.
Revised after the source audit, the parcel was returned to the supplier. — Past-participial phrase: “Revised after the source audit”; it modifies the subject that immediately follows and describes its state or history.
The students wearing the yellow jacket received numbered tickets. — Participial phrase: “wearing the yellow jacket”; it modifies the noun immediately before it rather than forming the sentence’s finite verb.
The bridge, revised after the audit, still carries the original plaque. — Participial phrase: “revised after the audit”; the commas mark supplementary modification of an already identified noun.
Faulty attachment: Photographing the damaged railing during the morning check, the crack appeared longer. Repair: Photographing the damaged railing during the morning check, the inspector saw that the crack appeared longer. — The participial phrase must modify the inspector, so that actor is made the subject of the main clause.
Reviewing the source note, the analyst found a rounding difference. — Participial phrase: “Reviewing the source note”; the understood actor is the grammatical subject of the following main clause.
Revised after the source audit, the staircase received an additional inspection. — Past-participial phrase: “Revised after the source audit”; it modifies the subject that immediately follows and describes its state or history.
The students reviewing the raw dataset went directly to the front desk. — Participial phrase: “reviewing the raw dataset”; it modifies the noun immediately before it rather than forming the sentence’s finite verb.
The bridge, damaged during transit, opened without corruption. — Participial phrase: “damaged during transit”; the commas mark supplementary modification of an already identified noun.
Faulty attachment: Photographing the damaged railing before the handoff, the crack appeared longer. Repair: Photographing the damaged railing before the handoff, the inspector saw that the crack appeared longer. — The participial phrase must modify the inspector, so that actor is made the subject of the main clause.
Reviewing the source note, the guide moved the group uphill. — Participial phrase: “Reviewing the source note”; the understood actor is the grammatical subject of the following main clause.
Revised after the source audit, the report now states the missing limitation. — Past-participial phrase: “Revised after the source audit”; it modifies the subject that immediately follows and describes its state or history.
The students waiting beside the marked door paused the test. — Participial phrase: “waiting beside the marked door”; it modifies the noun immediately before it rather than forming the sentence’s finite verb.
The bridge, built in the 1920s, passed the second check. — Participial phrase: “built in the 1920s”; the commas mark supplementary modification of an already identified noun.
Faulty attachment: Photographing the damaged railing after the second review, the crack appeared longer. Repair: Photographing the damaged railing after the second review, the inspector saw that the crack appeared longer. — The participial phrase must modify the inspector, so that actor is made the subject of the main clause.
Reviewing the source note, the manager identified a conflicting clause. — Participial phrase: “Reviewing the source note”; the understood actor is the grammatical subject of the following main clause.
Revised after the source audit, the sample remained unopened until testing. — Past-participial phrase: “Revised after the source audit”; it modifies the subject that immediately follows and describes its state or history.
The students carrying the sealed envelope stopped at the junction. — Participial phrase: “carrying the sealed envelope”; it modifies the noun immediately before it rather than forming the sentence’s finite verb.
The bridge, saved before the outage, reopens only after clearance. — Participial phrase: “saved before the outage”; the commas mark supplementary modification of an already identified noun.
Faulty attachment: Photographing the damaged railing at the final checkpoint, the crack appeared longer. Repair: Photographing the damaged railing at the final checkpoint, the inspector saw that the crack appeared longer. — The participial phrase must modify the inspector, so that actor is made the subject of the main clause.
Reviewing the source note, the engineer recorded the failover time. — Participial phrase: “Reviewing the source note”; the understood actor is the grammatical subject of the following main clause.
Revised after the source audit, the archive box required cross-checking. — Past-participial phrase: “Revised after the source audit”; it modifies the subject that immediately follows and describes its state or history.
The students checking the pressure gauge found the missing index card. — Participial phrase: “checking the pressure gauge”; it modifies the noun immediately before it rather than forming the sentence’s finite verb.
The bridge, calibrated that morning, shows three distinct hands. — Participial phrase: “calibrated that morning”; the commas mark supplementary modification of an already identified noun.
Faulty attachment: Photographing the damaged railing while the room was quiet, the crack appeared longer. Repair: Photographing the damaged railing while the room was quiet, the inspector saw that the crack appeared longer. — The participial phrase must modify the inspector, so that actor is made the subject of the main clause.
Reviewing the source note, the inspector documented a second crack. — Participial phrase: “Reviewing the source note”; the understood actor is the grammatical subject of the following main clause.
Revised after the source audit, the shipment arrived after the cutoff. — Past-participial phrase: “Revised after the source audit”; it modifies the subject that immediately follows and describes its state or history.
The students leading the second group added a scale marker. — Participial phrase: “leading the second group”; it modifies the noun immediately before it rather than forming the sentence’s finite verb.
The bridge, closed after the rockfall, contains the backup key. — Participial phrase: “closed after the rockfall”; the commas mark supplementary modification of an already identified noun.
Faulty attachment: Photographing the damaged railing before the next decision, the crack appeared longer. Repair: Photographing the damaged railing before the next decision, the inspector saw that the crack appeared longer. — The participial phrase must modify the inspector, so that actor is made the subject of the main clause.
Listening for the warning tone, the editor found the earlier wording. — Participial phrase: “Listening for the warning tone”; the understood actor is the grammatical subject of the following main clause.
Revised after the source audit, the manuscript stayed in stable condition. — Past-participial phrase: “Revised after the source audit”; it modifies the subject that immediately follows and describes its state or history.
The students sorting the returned volumes was called into the room. — Participial phrase: “sorting the returned volumes”; it modifies the noun immediately before it rather than forming the sentence’s finite verb.
The bridge, annotated by the editor, records the earlier condition. — Participial phrase: “annotated by the editor”; the commas mark supplementary modification of an already identified noun.
Faulty attachment: Sorting the returned volumes during the morning check, the missing index sheet was easy to spot. Repair: Sorting the returned volumes during the morning check, the librarian spotted the missing index sheet. — The participial phrase must modify the librarian, so that actor is made the subject of the main clause.
Listening for the warning tone, Mara noticed a missing trail marker. — Participial phrase: “Listening for the warning tone”; the understood actor is the grammatical subject of the following main clause.
Revised after the source audit, the policy entered the publication queue. — Past-participial phrase: “Revised after the source audit”; it modifies the subject that immediately follows and describes its state or history.
The students photographing the damaged railing captured the final frame. — Participial phrase: “photographing the damaged railing”; it modifies the noun immediately before it rather than forming the sentence’s finite verb.
The bridge, locked during the inspection, takes effect next Monday. — Participial phrase: “locked during the inspection”; the commas mark supplementary modification of an already identified noun.
Faulty attachment: Sorting the returned volumes before the handoff, the missing index sheet was easy to spot. Repair: Sorting the returned volumes before the handoff, the librarian spotted the missing index sheet. — The participial phrase must modify the librarian, so that actor is made the subject of the main clause.
Listening for the warning tone, the reviewer caught an unsupported inference. — Participial phrase: “Listening for the warning tone”; the understood actor is the grammatical subject of the following main clause.
Revised after the source audit, the wall provided a useful comparison image. — Past-participial phrase: “Revised after the source audit”; it modifies the subject that immediately follows and describes its state or history.
The students holding the blue folder avoided the closed bridge. — Participial phrase: “holding the blue folder”; it modifies the noun immediately before it rather than forming the sentence’s finite verb.
The bridge, taken before sunrise, remained sealed until analysis. — Participial phrase: “taken before sunrise”; the commas mark supplementary modification of an already identified noun.
Faulty attachment: Sorting the returned volumes after the second review, the missing index sheet was easy to spot. Repair: Sorting the returned volumes after the second review, the librarian spotted the missing index sheet. — The participial phrase must modify the librarian, so that actor is made the subject of the main clause.
Listening for the warning tone, the technician heard the second alarm. — Participial phrase: “Listening for the warning tone”; the understood actor is the grammatical subject of the following main clause.
Revised after the source audit, the annotation remained readable. — Past-participial phrase: “Revised after the source audit”; it modifies the subject that immediately follows and describes its state or history.
The students standing near the side entrance saved a backup copy. — Participial phrase: “standing near the side entrance”; it modifies the noun immediately before it rather than forming the sentence’s finite verb.
The bridge, approved on Tuesday, was moved after the warning. — Participial phrase: “approved on Tuesday”; the commas mark supplementary modification of an already identified noun.
Faulty attachment: Sorting the returned volumes at the final checkpoint, the missing index sheet was easy to spot. Repair: Sorting the returned volumes at the final checkpoint, the librarian spotted the missing index sheet. — The participial phrase must modify the librarian, so that actor is made the subject of the main clause.
Listening for the warning tone, the courier signed the handoff log. — Participial phrase: “Listening for the warning tone”; the understood actor is the grammatical subject of the following main clause.
Revised after the source audit, the backup server continued logging locally. — Past-participial phrase: “Revised after the source audit”; it modifies the subject that immediately follows and describes its state or history.
The students following the detour signs signaled before turning. — Participial phrase: “following the detour signs”; it modifies the noun immediately before it rather than forming the sentence’s finite verb.
The bridge, collected at the riverbank, includes the missing assumption. — Participial phrase: “collected at the riverbank”; the commas mark supplementary modification of an already identified noun.
Faulty attachment: Sorting the returned volumes while the room was quiet, the missing index sheet was easy to spot. Repair: Sorting the returned volumes while the room was quiet, the librarian spotted the missing index sheet. — The participial phrase must modify the librarian, so that actor is made the subject of the main clause.
Listening for the warning tone, the analyst found a rounding difference. — Participial phrase: “Listening for the warning tone”; the understood actor is the grammatical subject of the following main clause.
Revised after the source audit, the equipment stayed dry overnight. — Past-participial phrase: “Revised after the source audit”; it modifies the subject that immediately follows and describes its state or history.
The students recording the interview locally noticed the duplicated record. — Participial phrase: “recording the interview locally”; it modifies the noun immediately before it rather than forming the sentence’s finite verb.
The bridge, stored under cover, was returned to the sender. — Participial phrase: “stored under cover”; the commas mark supplementary modification of an already identified noun.
Faulty attachment: Sorting the returned volumes before the next decision, the missing index sheet was easy to spot. Repair: Sorting the returned volumes before the next decision, the librarian spotted the missing index sheet. — The participial phrase must modify the librarian, so that actor is made the subject of the main clause.
Listening for the warning tone, the guide moved the group uphill. — Participial phrase: “Listening for the warning tone”; the understood actor is the grammatical subject of the following main clause.
Sealed at the collection site, the parcel was returned to the supplier. — Past-participial phrase: “Sealed at the collection site”; it modifies the subject that immediately follows and describes its state or history.
The courier wearing the yellow jacket went directly to the front desk. — Participial phrase: “wearing the yellow jacket”; it modifies the noun immediately before it rather than forming the sentence’s finite verb.
The file, revised after the audit, opened without corruption. — Participial phrase: “revised after the audit”; the commas mark supplementary modification of an already identified noun.
Faulty attachment: Reading the contract again during the morning check, the deadline still seemed vague. Repair: Reading the contract again during the morning check, the manager still found the deadline vague. — The participial phrase must modify the manager, so that actor is made the subject of the main clause.
Listening for the warning tone, the manager identified a conflicting clause. — Participial phrase: “Listening for the warning tone”; the understood actor is the grammatical subject of the following main clause.
Sealed at the collection site, the staircase received an additional inspection. — Past-participial phrase: “Sealed at the collection site”; it modifies the subject that immediately follows and describes its state or history.
The courier reviewing the raw dataset paused the test. — Participial phrase: “reviewing the raw dataset”; it modifies the noun immediately before it rather than forming the sentence’s finite verb.
The file, damaged during transit, passed the second check. — Participial phrase: “damaged during transit”; the commas mark supplementary modification of an already identified noun.
Faulty attachment: Reading the contract again before the handoff, the deadline still seemed vague. Repair: Reading the contract again before the handoff, the manager still found the deadline vague. — The participial phrase must modify the manager, so that actor is made the subject of the main clause.
Listening for the warning tone, the engineer recorded the failover time. — Participial phrase: “Listening for the warning tone”; the understood actor is the grammatical subject of the following main clause.
Sealed at the collection site, the report now states the missing limitation. — Past-participial phrase: “Sealed at the collection site”; it modifies the subject that immediately follows and describes its state or history.
The courier waiting beside the marked door stopped at the junction. — Participial phrase: “waiting beside the marked door”; it modifies the noun immediately before it rather than forming the sentence’s finite verb.
The file, built in the 1920s, reopens only after clearance. — Participial phrase: “built in the 1920s”; the commas mark supplementary modification of an already identified noun.
Faulty attachment: Reading the contract again after the second review, the deadline still seemed vague. Repair: Reading the contract again after the second review, the manager still found the deadline vague. — The participial phrase must modify the manager, so that actor is made the subject of the main clause.
Listening for the warning tone, the inspector documented a second crack. — Participial phrase: “Listening for the warning tone”; the understood actor is the grammatical subject of the following main clause.
Sealed at the collection site, the sample remained unopened until testing. — Past-participial phrase: “Sealed at the collection site”; it modifies the subject that immediately follows and describes its state or history.
The courier carrying the sealed envelope found the missing index card. — Participial phrase: “carrying the sealed envelope”; it modifies the noun immediately before it rather than forming the sentence’s finite verb.
The file, saved before the outage, shows three distinct hands. — Participial phrase: “saved before the outage”; the commas mark supplementary modification of an already identified noun.
Faulty attachment: Reading the contract again at the final checkpoint, the deadline still seemed vague. Repair: Reading the contract again at the final checkpoint, the manager still found the deadline vague. — The participial phrase must modify the manager, so that actor is made the subject of the main clause.
Carrying the sealed sample, the editor found the earlier wording. — Participial phrase: “Carrying the sealed sample”; the understood actor is the grammatical subject of the following main clause.
Sealed at the collection site, the archive box required cross-checking. — Past-participial phrase: “Sealed at the collection site”; it modifies the subject that immediately follows and describes its state or history.
The courier checking the pressure gauge added a scale marker. — Participial phrase: “checking the pressure gauge”; it modifies the noun immediately before it rather than forming the sentence’s finite verb.
The file, calibrated that morning, contains the backup key. — Participial phrase: “calibrated that morning”; the commas mark supplementary modification of an already identified noun.
Faulty attachment: Reading the contract again while the room was quiet, the deadline still seemed vague. Repair: Reading the contract again while the room was quiet, the manager still found the deadline vague. — The participial phrase must modify the manager, so that actor is made the subject of the main clause.
Carrying the sealed sample, Mara noticed a missing trail marker. — Participial phrase: “Carrying the sealed sample”; the understood actor is the grammatical subject of the following main clause.
Sealed at the collection site, the shipment arrived after the cutoff. — Past-participial phrase: “Sealed at the collection site”; it modifies the subject that immediately follows and describes its state or history.
The courier leading the second group was called into the room. — Participial phrase: “leading the second group”; it modifies the noun immediately before it rather than forming the sentence’s finite verb.
The file, closed after the rockfall, records the earlier condition. — Participial phrase: “closed after the rockfall”; the commas mark supplementary modification of an already identified noun.
Faulty attachment: Reading the contract again before the next decision, the deadline still seemed vague. Repair: Reading the contract again before the next decision, the manager still found the deadline vague. — The participial phrase must modify the manager, so that actor is made the subject of the main clause.
Carrying the sealed sample, the reviewer caught an unsupported inference. — Participial phrase: “Carrying the sealed sample”; the understood actor is the grammatical subject of the following main clause.
Sealed at the collection site, the manuscript stayed in stable condition. — Past-participial phrase: “Sealed at the collection site”; it modifies the subject that immediately follows and describes its state or history.
The courier sorting the returned volumes captured the final frame. — Participial phrase: “sorting the returned volumes”; it modifies the noun immediately before it rather than forming the sentence’s finite verb.
The file, annotated by the editor, takes effect next Monday. — Participial phrase: “annotated by the editor”; the commas mark supplementary modification of an already identified noun.
Faulty attachment: Interviewing the second witness during the morning check, the timeline became more precise. Repair: Interviewing the second witness during the morning check, the researcher built a more precise timeline. — The participial phrase must modify the researcher, so that actor is made the subject of the main clause.
Carrying the sealed sample, the technician heard the second alarm. — Participial phrase: “Carrying the sealed sample”; the understood actor is the grammatical subject of the following main clause.
Sealed at the collection site, the policy entered the publication queue. — Past-participial phrase: “Sealed at the collection site”; it modifies the subject that immediately follows and describes its state or history.
The courier photographing the damaged railing avoided the closed bridge. — Participial phrase: “photographing the damaged railing”; it modifies the noun immediately before it rather than forming the sentence’s finite verb.
The file, locked during the inspection, remained sealed until analysis. — Participial phrase: “locked during the inspection”; the commas mark supplementary modification of an already identified noun.
Faulty attachment: Interviewing the second witness before the handoff, the timeline became more precise. Repair: Interviewing the second witness before the handoff, the researcher built a more precise timeline. — The participial phrase must modify the researcher, so that actor is made the subject of the main clause.
Carrying the sealed sample, the courier signed the handoff log. — Participial phrase: “Carrying the sealed sample”; the understood actor is the grammatical subject of the following main clause.
Sealed at the collection site, the wall provided a useful comparison image. — Past-participial phrase: “Sealed at the collection site”; it modifies the subject that immediately follows and describes its state or history.
The courier holding the blue folder saved a backup copy. — Participial phrase: “holding the blue folder”; it modifies the noun immediately before it rather than forming the sentence’s finite verb.
The file, taken before sunrise, was moved after the warning. — Participial phrase: “taken before sunrise”; the commas mark supplementary modification of an already identified noun.
Faulty attachment: Interviewing the second witness after the second review, the timeline became more precise. Repair: Interviewing the second witness after the second review, the researcher built a more precise timeline. — The participial phrase must modify the researcher, so that actor is made the subject of the main clause.
Carrying the sealed sample, the analyst found a rounding difference. — Participial phrase: “Carrying the sealed sample”; the understood actor is the grammatical subject of the following main clause.
Sealed at the collection site, the annotation remained readable. — Past-participial phrase: “Sealed at the collection site”; it modifies the subject that immediately follows and describes its state or history.
The courier standing near the side entrance signaled before turning. — Participial phrase: “standing near the side entrance”; it modifies the noun immediately before it rather than forming the sentence’s finite verb.
The file, approved on Tuesday, includes the missing assumption. — Participial phrase: “approved on Tuesday”; the commas mark supplementary modification of an already identified noun.
Faulty attachment: Interviewing the second witness at the final checkpoint, the timeline became more precise. Repair: Interviewing the second witness at the final checkpoint, the researcher built a more precise timeline. — The participial phrase must modify the researcher, so that actor is made the subject of the main clause.
Carrying the sealed sample, the guide moved the group uphill. — Participial phrase: “Carrying the sealed sample”; the understood actor is the grammatical subject of the following main clause.
Sealed at the collection site, the backup server continued logging locally. — Past-participial phrase: “Sealed at the collection site”; it modifies the subject that immediately follows and describes its state or history.
The courier following the detour signs noticed the duplicated record. — Participial phrase: “following the detour signs”; it modifies the noun immediately before it rather than forming the sentence’s finite verb.
The file, collected at the riverbank, was returned to the sender. — Participial phrase: “collected at the riverbank”; the commas mark supplementary modification of an already identified noun.
Faulty attachment: Interviewing the second witness while the room was quiet, the timeline became more precise. Repair: Interviewing the second witness while the room was quiet, the researcher built a more precise timeline. — The participial phrase must modify the researcher, so that actor is made the subject of the main clause.
Carrying the sealed sample, the manager identified a conflicting clause. — Participial phrase: “Carrying the sealed sample”; the understood actor is the grammatical subject of the following main clause.
Sealed at the collection site, the equipment stayed dry overnight. — Past-participial phrase: “Sealed at the collection site”; it modifies the subject that immediately follows and describes its state or history.
The courier recording the interview locally received numbered tickets. — Participial phrase: “recording the interview locally”; it modifies the noun immediately before it rather than forming the sentence’s finite verb.
The file, stored under cover, still carries the original plaque. — Participial phrase: “stored under cover”; the commas mark supplementary modification of an already identified noun.
Faulty attachment: Interviewing the second witness before the next decision, the timeline became more precise. Repair: Interviewing the second witness before the next decision, the researcher built a more precise timeline. — The participial phrase must modify the researcher, so that actor is made the subject of the main clause.
Carrying the sealed sample, the engineer recorded the failover time. — Participial phrase: “Carrying the sealed sample”; the understood actor is the grammatical subject of the following main clause.
Marked with the older numbering system, the parcel was returned to the supplier. — Past-participial phrase: “Marked with the older numbering system”; it modifies the subject that immediately follows and describes its state or history.
The technician wearing the yellow jacket paused the test. — Participial phrase: “wearing the yellow jacket”; it modifies the noun immediately before it rather than forming the sentence’s finite verb.
The sensor, revised after the audit, passed the second check. — Participial phrase: “revised after the audit”; the commas mark supplementary modification of an already identified noun.
Faulty attachment: Following the signed detour during the morning check, the station seemed farther away. Repair: Following the signed detour during the morning check, the driver found the station farther away than expected. — The participial phrase must modify the driver, so that actor is made the subject of the main clause.
Carrying the sealed sample, the inspector documented a second crack. — Participial phrase: “Carrying the sealed sample”; the understood actor is the grammatical subject of the following main clause.
Marked with the older numbering system, the staircase received an additional inspection. — Past-participial phrase: “Marked with the older numbering system”; it modifies the subject that immediately follows and describes its state or history.
The technician reviewing the raw dataset stopped at the junction. — Participial phrase: “reviewing the raw dataset”; it modifies the noun immediately before it rather than forming the sentence’s finite verb.
The sensor, damaged during transit, reopens only after clearance. — Participial phrase: “damaged during transit”; the commas mark supplementary modification of an already identified noun.
Faulty attachment: Following the signed detour before the handoff, the station seemed farther away. Repair: Following the signed detour before the handoff, the driver found the station farther away than expected. — The participial phrase must modify the driver, so that actor is made the subject of the main clause.
Comparing both estimates, the editor found the earlier wording. — Participial phrase: “Comparing both estimates”; the understood actor is the grammatical subject of the following main clause.
Marked with the older numbering system, the report now states the missing limitation. — Past-participial phrase: “Marked with the older numbering system”; it modifies the subject that immediately follows and describes its state or history.
The technician waiting beside the marked door found the missing index card. — Participial phrase: “waiting beside the marked door”; it modifies the noun immediately before it rather than forming the sentence’s finite verb.
The sensor, built in the 1920s, shows three distinct hands. — Participial phrase: “built in the 1920s”; the commas mark supplementary modification of an already identified noun.
Faulty attachment: Following the signed detour after the second review, the station seemed farther away. Repair: Following the signed detour after the second review, the driver found the station farther away than expected. — The participial phrase must modify the driver, so that actor is made the subject of the main clause.
Comparing both estimates, Mara noticed a missing trail marker. — Participial phrase: “Comparing both estimates”; the understood actor is the grammatical subject of the following main clause.
Marked with the older numbering system, the sample remained unopened until testing. — Past-participial phrase: “Marked with the older numbering system”; it modifies the subject that immediately follows and describes its state or history.
The technician carrying the sealed envelope added a scale marker. — Participial phrase: “carrying the sealed envelope”; it modifies the noun immediately before it rather than forming the sentence’s finite verb.
The sensor, saved before the outage, contains the backup key. — Participial phrase: “saved before the outage”; the commas mark supplementary modification of an already identified noun.
Faulty attachment: Following the signed detour at the final checkpoint, the station seemed farther away. Repair: Following the signed detour at the final checkpoint, the driver found the station farther away than expected. — The participial phrase must modify the driver, so that actor is made the subject of the main clause.
Comparing both estimates, the reviewer caught an unsupported inference. — Participial phrase: “Comparing both estimates”; the understood actor is the grammatical subject of the following main clause.
Marked with the older numbering system, the archive box required cross-checking. — Past-participial phrase: “Marked with the older numbering system”; it modifies the subject that immediately follows and describes its state or history.
The technician checking the pressure gauge was called into the room. — Participial phrase: “checking the pressure gauge”; it modifies the noun immediately before it rather than forming the sentence’s finite verb.
The sensor, calibrated that morning, records the earlier condition. — Participial phrase: “calibrated that morning”; the commas mark supplementary modification of an already identified noun.
Faulty attachment: Following the signed detour while the room was quiet, the station seemed farther away. Repair: Following the signed detour while the room was quiet, the driver found the station farther away than expected. — The participial phrase must modify the driver, so that actor is made the subject of the main clause.
Comparing both estimates, the technician heard the second alarm. — Participial phrase: “Comparing both estimates”; the understood actor is the grammatical subject of the following main clause.
Marked with the older numbering system, the shipment arrived after the cutoff. — Past-participial phrase: “Marked with the older numbering system”; it modifies the subject that immediately follows and describes its state or history.
The technician leading the second group captured the final frame. — Participial phrase: “leading the second group”; it modifies the noun immediately before it rather than forming the sentence’s finite verb.
The sensor, closed after the rockfall, takes effect next Monday. — Participial phrase: “closed after the rockfall”; the commas mark supplementary modification of an already identified noun.
Faulty attachment: Following the signed detour before the next decision, the station seemed farther away. Repair: Following the signed detour before the next decision, the driver found the station farther away than expected. — The participial phrase must modify the driver, so that actor is made the subject of the main clause.
Comparing both estimates, the courier signed the handoff log. — Participial phrase: “Comparing both estimates”; the understood actor is the grammatical subject of the following main clause.
Marked with the older numbering system, the manuscript stayed in stable condition. — Past-participial phrase: “Marked with the older numbering system”; it modifies the subject that immediately follows and describes its state or history.
The technician sorting the returned volumes avoided the closed bridge. — Participial phrase: “sorting the returned volumes”; it modifies the noun immediately before it rather than forming the sentence’s finite verb.
The sensor, annotated by the editor, remained sealed until analysis. — Participial phrase: “annotated by the editor”; the commas mark supplementary modification of an already identified noun.
Faulty attachment: Adjusting the camera near the entrance during the morning check, the reflection became less distracting. Repair: Adjusting the camera near the entrance during the morning check, the photographer reduced the distracting reflection. — The participial phrase must modify the photographer, so that actor is made the subject of the main clause.
Comparing both estimates, the analyst found a rounding difference. — Participial phrase: “Comparing both estimates”; the understood actor is the grammatical subject of the following main clause.
Marked with the older numbering system, the policy entered the publication queue. — Past-participial phrase: “Marked with the older numbering system”; it modifies the subject that immediately follows and describes its state or history.
The technician photographing the damaged railing saved a backup copy. — Participial phrase: “photographing the damaged railing”; it modifies the noun immediately before it rather than forming the sentence’s finite verb.
The sensor, locked during the inspection, was moved after the warning. — Participial phrase: “locked during the inspection”; the commas mark supplementary modification of an already identified noun.
Faulty attachment: Adjusting the camera near the entrance before the handoff, the reflection became less distracting. Repair: Adjusting the camera near the entrance before the handoff, the photographer reduced the distracting reflection. — The participial phrase must modify the photographer, so that actor is made the subject of the main clause.
Comparing both estimates, the guide moved the group uphill. — Participial phrase: “Comparing both estimates”; the understood actor is the grammatical subject of the following main clause.
Marked with the older numbering system, the wall provided a useful comparison image. — Past-participial phrase: “Marked with the older numbering system”; it modifies the subject that immediately follows and describes its state or history.
The technician holding the blue folder signaled before turning. — Participial phrase: “holding the blue folder”; it modifies the noun immediately before it rather than forming the sentence’s finite verb.
The sensor, taken before sunrise, includes the missing assumption. — Participial phrase: “taken before sunrise”; the commas mark supplementary modification of an already identified noun.
Faulty attachment: Adjusting the camera near the entrance after the second review, the reflection became less distracting. Repair: Adjusting the camera near the entrance after the second review, the photographer reduced the distracting reflection. — The participial phrase must modify the photographer, so that actor is made the subject of the main clause.
Comparing both estimates, the manager identified a conflicting clause. — Participial phrase: “Comparing both estimates”; the understood actor is the grammatical subject of the following main clause.
Marked with the older numbering system, the annotation remained readable. — Past-participial phrase: “Marked with the older numbering system”; it modifies the subject that immediately follows and describes its state or history.
The technician standing near the side entrance noticed the duplicated record. — Participial phrase: “standing near the side entrance”; it modifies the noun immediately before it rather than forming the sentence’s finite verb.
The sensor, approved on Tuesday, was returned to the sender. — Participial phrase: “approved on Tuesday”; the commas mark supplementary modification of an already identified noun.
Faulty attachment: Adjusting the camera near the entrance at the final checkpoint, the reflection became less distracting. Repair: Adjusting the camera near the entrance at the final checkpoint, the photographer reduced the distracting reflection. — The participial phrase must modify the photographer, so that actor is made the subject of the main clause.
Comparing both estimates, the engineer recorded the failover time. — Participial phrase: “Comparing both estimates”; the understood actor is the grammatical subject of the following main clause.
Marked with the older numbering system, the backup server continued logging locally. — Past-participial phrase: “Marked with the older numbering system”; it modifies the subject that immediately follows and describes its state or history.
Keep the underlying decision or pattern, then replace the subject, evidence, relationship, constraints, and tone with details that belong to your situation. If your final line still works after swapping only one noun, it may be too close to the example.