Diction Template 1
Word-level analysis: The choice of “[word]” rather than “[neutral alternative]” suggests [connotation/register].
Start with structure, then replace every placeholder with information that is true, relevant, and natural for your context. These templates are intentionally skeletal so your final writing does not sound mass-produced.
Strong diction is exact enough for the writer, speaker, audience and purpose, and its connotations and register support the intended meaning without accidental vagueness, inflated formality or false precision. Diction analysis points to actual lexical evidence rather than labeling prose “good” or “bad.”
Word-level analysis: The choice of “[word]” rather than “[neutral alternative]” suggests [connotation/register].
Pattern analysis: Repeated [semantic field] diction frames [subject] as [interpretation].
Character diction: [Character] tends to use [type of vocabulary], revealing [background/attitude].
Revision: Replace vague “[word]” with [more precise word] when the intended meaning is [specific distinction].
Dependency and propagation audit: Claim / example / recommendation [x] | Controlling source / project record [x] | Dependency strength [direct / shared / advisory / independent] | Review trigger / reason code [x] | Needs-review scope [local / direct dependents / cluster] | Replacement source requirements [x] | Carry-forward decision [x] | Propagation targets [x] | Reader disclosure / changelog action [x].
Persistent editorial registry audit: Topic slug → [ ]; claim UID/key → [ ]; source UID/key → [ ]; dependency UID + strength → [ ]; source status/version → [ ]; open review UID/reason/priority → [ ]; replacement source if any → [ ]; reviewer + resolution → [ ].
Word-choice audit Target word/phrase: [ ] Literal meaning: [ ] Connotation: [ ] Register/formality: [ ] More precise alternative: [ ] Effect of change: [ ]
Precision ladder Vague word: [ ] Category: [ ] More specific option: [ ] Most exact useful option: [ ] Point where specificity becomes distracting: [ ]
Register check Audience: [ ] Purpose: [ ] Current phrase: [ ] Too formal / too casual / appropriate: [ ] Revision: [ ]
Connotation comparison Neutral term: [ ] Option A: [ ] → association [ ] Option B: [ ] → association [ ] Desired attitude/effect: [ ] Best choice: [ ]
Domain-language check Speaker/writer expertise: [ ] Technical term: [ ] Would this person naturally know/use it?: [ ] Reader support needed?: [ ] Plain-language gloss: [ ]
Semantic-field map Repeated word family: [ ] Examples in passage: [ ] Pattern readers may notice: [ ] Tone/theme/character effect: [ ] One repetition to vary: [ ]
Verb-strength pass Weak/generic verb: [ ] Actual action: [ ] More exact verb: [ ] Does stronger wording overstate?: [ ] Final choice: [ ]
Concrete-vs-abstract test Abstract wording: [ ] Concrete detail available: [ ] What must stay abstract: [ ] Revision balance: [ ]
Plain-language pass Original phrase: [ ] Meaning that must remain exact: [ ] Simpler wording: [ ] Required term to retain: [ ] Final sentence: [ ]
Diction evidence note Claim about word choice: [ ] Quoted word/phrase: [ ] Denotation/register/connotation evidence: [ ] Effect in context: [ ] Avoided overclaim: [ ]